The question isn’t whether circumcision is a mutilation.
Most people do not want to hear that, but the real question I have for those who balk at its being described as such is whether it was advertised as a mutilation.
Most wouldn’t buy this ‘product’ if the facts were presented accurately by those seeking to be compensated for this ‘service.’
I started out with the idea of making a much longer ‘product’ information label (listing the features ablated, the functions destroyed, the number of medical-ethical failures which occur each time a ‘healing arts professional’ attacks a child’s penis, the number of current laws which (by reasonable application) could protect male infants…), but I opted to keep it simple.
Were it not for a fanatical reverence for this one pet mutilation, most would agree the Recommend LIFETIME Allowance for non-therapeutic, non-consensual amputations is ZERO.
Pretty easy, huh? ~Devon